Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] what's the difference?
From: Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 16:32:55 -0800
References: <5.0.2.1.0.20020131211919.02e3a008@mail.chroniclenetworks.com> <002b01c1a9ce$7b9da290$ad466cd8@TELLURIUM> <20020130183526.22560.qmail@web9503.mail.yahoo.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020130155711.03959e88@pop.alink.net> <5.0.2.1.0.20020131211919.02e3a008@mail.chroniclenetworks.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020201095144.0395e510@pop.alink.net> <3C8E91F0.4A8F46DB@d2.com> <000d01c1ca23$341f09c0$78c20a44@hr.cox.net>
 
Hmmm, I've knew that, but I wonder why the difference in asa (320 pro 
vs. 400 consumer).

feli

Andrew Touchon wrote:
> 
> The professional films are more sensitive to storage conditions (heat) than
> the regular films.  I have used both types and I can't really tell the
> difference in quality.  However, I imagine that if you did scientific
> testing, you would find the professional films to be a slightly better
> product.

- -- 
________________________________________________________________________

When your head is full of dust and tofu it's easy to smile all the time.
							-Ethan Ormsby
________________________________________________________________________
      		 Feli di Giorgio * Compositing Supervisor 
        feli@d2.com * DIGITAL DOMAIN * (310) 314-2800 ext.3074
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies: Reply from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] what's the difference?)
Reply from "Will" <wlarsen@ocsnet.net> (Re: [Leica] what's the difference?)
 In reply to: Message from Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com> ([Leica] what's the difference?)
Message from "Andrew Touchon" <atouchon@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] what's the difference?)