Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] LTM (old Leica) Bashers; WAS "new user" LONG
From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 16:35:15 -0700
References: <1ab.34c804d.2a3114f8@aol.com>

I have to admit, now that I don't have a LTM, I feel like I _need_ one.
Go figure!
Especially since there is a rapidwinder on the way for the later models.
Slobodan Dimitrov

P2CON@aol.com wrote:
> 
> Keep it up guys, (BD, Martin, Slobodon, Kyle, & the rest), if you are
> successful in altering the mindset of those who would attempt photography
> with an old, and obsolete camera system, then maybe the prices for these
> wonderful cameras will come down to more reasonable levels. ;-)
> 
> Seriously though, I think you are preaching to the choir.  Those of us that
> actually use the old screw-mount cameras seem to do just fine, and get a big
> laugh out of your complaints.
> My own experience with all-mechanical, meterless cameras spans some fifty
> plus years starting with a little Retina folder that you had to focus using
> the distance scale and then set little levers and dials for aperture and
> shutter speed, and a manual cocking lever.  Right now on my wall there are a
> few prints from the Kodak slides that were taken with that camera in 1953.
> Exposure was set using the guide on the film box.
> The most "modern" camera in my stable is an EOS-10S from the mid-90's.  I
> haven't used it in the more than three years since rediscovering the joy of
> using these gorgeous little mechanical marvels, the screw-mount Leica and
> Canons.  I will admit to being a bit of a gear head, and do use other cameras
> for special needs where the rangefinders are less handy, (macro and tele use
> with or without motordrive).
> 
> Just this past Sunday there was a Concours de Elegance nearby showing classic
> cars and motorcycles. It was total eye-candy for a casual photo outing.  I
> carried a Leica IIIf with a CV 15mm and a Jupiter 3, 50mm, exposing a couple
> of rolls of 400 speed print film and one roll of Elite II, 100 speed.  No
> meter, and in bright sun to deep shade.  I may have missed five exposures out
> of the 100 shots.  Most shots were super close with something in the finder
> at 1 meter with the 15mm and around 5 - 10 meters with the 50mm for cars and
> motorcycles parading up to the trophy stand.  Talk about love of the great
> things from yesteryear, these people spend fortunes and years of their spare
> time on restoration of the best of the past. Cars and motorcycles from waaay
> back looking like they just came out of the showroom.  Ferraris, Aston
> Martens, Corvettes, Thunderbirds, Lamborginis, Panteras, Porches, Arials,
> Vincent, Triumph, Matchless, BMW, Harley Davidson, Pierce Arrow, and more.
> 
> It would have been sacrilegious to photograph the show with and F5 or even
> R8. The LTM cameras are easy to use and a delight to carry, and most
> certainly a decent entry to the Leica family.  If you buy one that works, it
> will probably keep working, and if not they are actually easy to get into
> good shape.
> 
> Just my opinion of course,
> Paul Connet
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from P2CON@aol.com ([Leica] LTM (old Leica) Bashers; WAS "new user" LONG)