Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It is faster, and it does have a better look...but it doesn't get you close enough when close enough is what's important...which is why it's worth having the 90 in your bag... - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Austin Franklin Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] Don't do it > As wonderful as the 75 is, George, with the work you do you're going > to come to curse the day you dumped the 90. You will quickly come to > realize that the 75 is really just a gorgeous 50 1.4 on mild steroids - > it gives you about a half-step, to a step, of reach, while the 90 really > brings the subject closer. Take it from one who's been there, done > that - and had to buy another 90.;-) Personally, it's the bokeh of the 75 that I like FAR better than the 90, and it's faster... I had both, dumped the 90. Austin - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html