Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I was assuming that the 3E and TE were both the tri-elmar based on the comment from Oliver below. DJ - --- "C. W. Satterfield" <cwsat@istate.net> wrote: > Isn't the TE, the tele-elmarit and the 3E the > tri-elmar? > > Darrell Jennings wrote: > > >Like everyone else that has replyed, I kept my > prime > >lenses (35 f1.4 and 50 Noctilux). The TE gave me a > 28 > >(which I didn't have), but mainly gave me > portability > >and speed (by not having to change lenses). If I > >didn't have the prime lenses, the TE might be used > to > >get me by, but there are times when you have to > have > >speed and the TE sure is slow. DJ > >--- Oliver Bryk <oliverbryk@attbi.com> wrote: > > > >>Did users of prime lenses in the focal lengths of > >>the Tri-Elmar, who later > >>bought a TE, continue to use these prime lenses or > >>sell them? > >>Oliver Bryk > >>Norton AntiVirus scans all my outgoing e-mail. > >> > >> > >>-- > >>To unsubscribe, see > >> > >http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > > >__________________________________________________ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better > >http://health.yahoo.com > >-- > >To unsubscribe, see > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html