Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Why not the usually good Kodak emulsions? Their 800 speed is not as crisp, > has more grain, and doesn't do as well with mixed lighting. Also, the > Fuji's tend to be cheaper. I'd agree that the Kodak is grainy. I almost fell off my rocker when I saw Max 800!! But the Pro 800 Fuji is hardly cheaper than almost anything. Price shop for this film. It's $35 a propack some places in Chicago. I know B&H seemed to have a good price on it a while back. If nothing else test out the Fuji SG800 and the NPZ800... The NPZ will handle your lighting better as Don said but the SG is far cheaper... - -- John Straus Chicago, IL http://SlideOne.com http://SlideOne.com/EditorsRoom ========================== - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html