Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree with your point of view. I like the fact that I can see work on line, but that is not the same as a print. DJ - --- Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> wrote: > Darrell Jennings wrote: > > > > Mark, not to pick on your comment, because I am > not > > sure how you intended "real" to be interpreted > here. > > But there is the crux of the issue...There are > some > > that think digital prints are not "real" prints. > > Since silver and other wet dark room prints are > > chemical/mechanical process, it seems to me that > any > > other chemical/mechanical process is just as > "real". > > It would be an interesting topic for a Leica poll. > > How many of us think digital printing is just as > > "real" as wet darkroom printing? > > > The way i feel about it is Darkroom Printing is just > as "real" and legit > as inkjet and any other computer stuff but I don't > feel an image on my > computer screen is as "real" and legit as those > prints on paper. > Or someone opening up their laptop to show me their > "portfolio." > For me that does not cut it. > > Pixels don't impress me. The beef is on paper. > > Mark Rabiner > Portland, Oregon USA > http://www.markrabiner.com > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html