Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Steve: The pics look good. I'm encouraged - the coma looks like the Sonnars of which I am so fond - so not bad. How low of a shutter speed was week 38a? Cheers - ------------ Dante Stella On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Steve LeHuray wrote: > > > > I just bought one of these at a price which was a little too low to turn > > down -- of the people here who have used this lens, can you point me to > > any pictures? Any opinions (assuming that you have actually used one?) > > I have heard various negative things, but then again I have also heard > > bad things about my beloved Canon 50/1.2 too. > > > > I am actually looking forward to one of these lenses so please don't > > ruin the fun by saying the ASPH version is better... I imagine that for > > what the ASPH sells at, it had damn better be! > > > > Thanks > > Dante > > > > Dante, > > One of my favorites Here are a few, all at f/1.4: > > http://www.streetphoto.net/photo_of_the_week/wk10.jpeg > > http://www.streetphoto.net/photo_of_the_week/wk13.jpg > > http://www.streetphoto.net/photo_of_the_week/wk17a.jpg > > http://www.streetphoto.net/photo_of_the_week/wk38.jpeg > > http://www.streetphoto.net/photo_of_the_week/wk38a.jpeg > > I do not think it is as bad as some have made it out to be. According to > Erwin it is the same optically as the 3rd version 35/2.0, except with one > more stop. Not an ASPH but still very good. > > sl > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html