Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] LHSA Meetings. It's not just about cameras anymore.
From: "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@harbornet.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 20:14:30 -0700
References: <B091F22120504B47B062C7C0D9E6FED920B4F7@EMS3.umassb.net> <3D45CA35.B8483F3C@markrabiner.com> <020c01c23761$de0f5f60$fc8402c7@bayeramd> <3D45E6BF.71077301@markrabiner.com>

Interesting, Mark.  I was thinking that 11 X 14 would kind of push the
envelope on a good print from the 35mm -- I have seen them taken on slow
chrome film and they look very nice, but ... 30 X 40 -- wow, that is
something I didn't think would look good at all.   Nice to know.

Thanks,

Ted

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@markrabiner.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] LHSA Meetings. It's not just about cameras anymore.


> Ted Bayer wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mark:
> >
> > I have not had the experience of seeing 24 by 30 inch prints from a
> > Leica negative.  I am curious about the quality of the image at this
> > magnification.  How good is it?
> >
> > What about 16 X 20?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ted in Olalla
>
> I have a 30x40 from a 35mm neg. On the wall which at my color rental
lab
> is a common occurrence.
> I must say thought that this was taken with a Nikon 10 or 15 years ago
> (and i must get in on my website).
> And there was even some camera moment to make the mix more
interesting.
> But i remember it was 35mm Kodacolor 100. I've not done 30x40 printing
> from Leica glass yet but I anticipate being made VERY happy I'd been
> using Leica glass when I do.
>
> If you stand two feet from it which is too close you can see some
grain.
> Some of that is because of the blur.
> Another shot i have in a different part of my studio was shot not 35mm
> Fujichrome then I make a 4x5 inch Internegative from it. It is
grainless
> at any distance. Highly saturated.
>
> People will be amazed to find 30x40 inch is a very viable size for
35mm
> photography. Even from faster films.
>
> Most would guess this was stretching it and in some ways maybe they'd
be
> right in my opinion.
> But I and others have no problem with it. Even when the grain is
visible
> it is usually not detrimental.
>
>
>
>
> By the way they make portfolio sizes for this size which you can carry
> under your arm.
>
>
> Mark Rabiner
> Portland, Oregon USA
> http://www.markrabiner.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] LHSA Meetings. It's not just about cameras anymore.)
In reply to: Message from "Stuart Phillips" <Stuart.Phillips@umb.edu> ([Leica] LHSA Meetings. It's not just about cameras anymore.)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] LHSA Meetings. It's not just about cameras anymore.)
Message from "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@harbornet.com> (Re: [Leica] LHSA Meetings. It's not just about cameras anymore.)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] LHSA Meetings. It's not just about cameras anymore.)