Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Kodak Tri-X and Tecnical Pan
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:20:34 -0400

Hi, Dan. I think what you meant to say below was..."The Ilford film is much
superior for MY purposes.";-)

Because I've used both and I know that Tri-X is definitely the superior
film - for MY purposes. ;-)

B. D.
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of D Khong
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:41 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodak Tri-X and Tecnical Pan


Eberhard Gronau
wrote:
>Hi out there,
>Kodak shocked me recently with their new black and white fact sheet, which
>lists all bw films available. Tri-x and Tec Pan are missing. This list has
>been published in germany. Does anybody know about deleting those two from
>the list.
>It would be painful to me, because I do most of my bw work with trix and
tec
>pan.

I used to use Tri-X. Then I changed to Ilford HP5+. The Ilford one is a
much superior film compared to Tri-X.

Dan K.


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net> (Re: [Leica] Kodak Tri-X and Tecnical Pan)