Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I tested the 35 Lux non-ASPH (last made)against the 35 Summicron non-ASPH (last made). They are equivalent in contrast and resolution from f2.8 on. At f2.0 they are virtually equivalent -- the lux is a little softer in the corners. At f1.4 I tested the 35 Lux non-ASPH against the legendary Nikkor 35 f1.4 AIS. The Leica lens is clearly superior in contrast and resolution to this great Nikkor. The 35 Lux non-ASPH does flare with the sun directly in the picture frame, the 35 Sum non-ASPH handles the sun well; hence, I don't use the 35 Lux non-ASPH to shoot into the sun. I always use the 35 Lux non-ASPH wide-open when I want the romantic effect (glowing highlights) generated by its spherical construction. This effect at f1.4 may not be the ultimate in sharpness and contrast (although it is better than the Nikkor 1.4), but the effect is quite beautiful -- superior to what a softar filter on an ASPH lens can produce. Again, I hope my subjectly objective tests help inform the debate. Tom __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html