Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Actually, rereading what I wrote, I see I was unintentionally ambiguous. I meant to say that the colour of the picture of the rolled car was very typically egglestonian, but the subject matter was too dramatic or even melodramatic. I associate him with the very ordinary - I love his pictures of the contents of fridges, for instance - not the implied dramatic narrative of this picture. Of course, it could be I've got him completely arse backwards ;-) R. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Appleby" <rob@robertappleby.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:32 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] eggleston envy > No aping is necessary, Carl ;-) Just go and do that thing you do. > > I find Eggleston's wonderful soft and yet rich colour very appealing. I > don't know where it is, but there is a very simple picture of a woman > sitting on a swing seat that's one of my favourites. It's the colour that > makes it. > > Some of his work is very crude, to my eye - such as the shot of a pair of > shoes under a bed, done with direct flash as I recall. A genuinely ugly > picture, whatever the intent. But I do think that when he does it right, > it's pretty unbeatable. He has hallmarked a style of photography, which is a > major achievement. > > R. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Carl Pultz" <cpultz@earthlink.net> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 7:19 PM > Subject: [Leica] eggleston envy > > > > Bob wrote: > > > > "..the one thing about it that seems Egglestonian to me is the colour. > It's > > too dramatic - it doesn't really fit my idea of his work." > > > > The image on the N'Yorker site is brighter and more saturated than the way > > the picture looks in the book, 2 1/4. In fact, like several shots in that > > book, it is rather washed out, like a chrome that is a bit overexposed. > > It's rather soft focused, too, like he focused just a bit short of the > car. > > Someone else suggested these were old Ektachromes that were fading by the > > time the book was assembled in 1999. > > > > Anyway, I am crazy for Eggleston. Too crazy. I can't help imitating the > > guy, like one of the shots I just posted. If they start to be good > > imitations, I'll feel a little better about this. > > > > It seems that his work has gotten softer over the years, color wise. The > > stuff in Democratic Forest looks more subtle to me than the earlier work > in > > the Guide. I've never seen an actual print, so I don't really know how > much > > is production variations in the books I have. > > > > If I found myself in Hebron, I might be able to ape Mr. Appleby just a > > little. Astonishing work, sir, and an important story. I hope they know > > that not all Americans are against them, for whatever that's worth. > > > > Carl > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html