Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] 35 mm RF lens test result
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:44:08 -0400

Well, Damn! I suppose that's possible - all though there was no mention
of focal length other than the 35 mm reference. :-)

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of John
Straus
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 7:30 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] 35 mm RF lens test result


on 8/15/02 5:49 PM, bdcolen at bdcolen@earthlink.net wrote:

> Well, there are two possibilities here - either they were testing the 
> LuxASPH, or the test isn't worth a damn....and I have to say that the 
> test sounds pretty poor anyway, as no 35 1.4 at 1.4 is going to do as 
> well as a 35 2 at f2...or were they only comparing the lenses from f 2

> onward. If that's the case, it's still a foolish test, because if you 
> buy a 35 1.4 you - hopefully - buy it because you need the speed. So 
> whether it performs quite as well at slower speeds as slower lenses 
> becomes somewhat irrelivant.
> 
> B. D.

I thought these were all 50's :)

- -- 
John Straus
Chicago, IL 
http://SlideOne.com
http://SlideOne.com/EditorsRoom
========================== 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html