Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Are you referring to Kodak chemical part number 7732-18-5 (water)? dab c. At 03:38 PM 16-08-02 +0300, you wrote: >At 08:00 16.8.2002 -0400, you wrote: >>The case against DHMO is here >> >> http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html >> >>and, yes, I know it sounds bad but please THINK about it before coming to a >>conclusion. >> >>Also could someone please state definitively whether DHMO is used in the >>Leica manufacturing process? I have heard that it is crucial in the >>manufacture of certain kinds of glass, for example. > >Oh dear god. I think they DO use DHMO in the manufacturing process of >Leicas, I've even heard that they mek the employees digest LIQUID DHMO! > > >I sure hope you're not seriously buying this... >Funny, yes. :) > >.mikko. > >www.geocities.com/kalavami >mikko.kalavainen@mobiili.net > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html