Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, Rolf - A replacement would make sense if R sales weren't dropping like the Dow.;-) - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Rolfe Tessem Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 9:42 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] R9 scoop - --On Wednesday, August 21, 2002 09:34:32 AM +0200 Pascal <cyberdog@attglobal.net> wrote: <snip> > So, if all that will be happening at Photokina appears to be a cut-down > R8, without any clear indication of a true R9 (not an AF but rather as > described above) and without clear commitment towards a digital R body, I > fear the worst for the R line in a couple of years. > > Pascal I would like to point out that people have been predicting the demise of the Leica SLR line for at least the past 25 years. If it wasn't killed off in the '70s, I don't think its going to be killed off now. I happen to love my R8, since I use it primarily with the longer and heavier lenses for which the body is a good match. But there are definitely those who think the body is too large or too heavy. If a smaller body will sell to that group, then it is a smart thing for Leica to do. The rumor that went around when the R6.2 was cancelled was that Leica had simply run out of body shells which, the story went, were supplied by Minolta. If that was the only reason for the cancellation and if the camera was still selling reasonably well, then a replacement would make sense. Rolfe - -- Rolfe Tessem Lucky Duck Productions, Inc. rolfe@ldp.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html