Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank god! When BD says "and that's my last word on the subject" you just know you're in for at least another twelve hours of mail ;-) I double dare you to reply to this with the same subject heading, college boy. R. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 11:27 PM Subject: RE: [Leica] RE: R9 scoop > I've responded to Doug, who did say what he says he said, off-list. I no > longer take responsibility for keeping this thread going. :-) > > B. D. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Douglas > Herr > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 4:53 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] RE: R9 scoop > > > > not one LUGer has really responded to the > > undeniable fact that revenue from the R line, as > > reported by Leica, has been dropping > > precipitously at the same time the M > > sales have gone up... > > Actually I did, B.D. You used this fact to bolster your opinion that the > line > should be dropped instead of introducing a revised R body. I used the same > fact to suggest that a revised R body was a good idea. Do you recall what > happened to R sales when the R8 was introduced? Up, substantially. > > > > Doug Herr<BR>Birdman of Sacramento<BR>http://www.wildlightphoto.com > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html