Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: college costs (WAS: [Leica] Photo education)
From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 14:10:41 -0700
References: <MBBBJHIBKCKEAEOKKBPOKEBJEFAA.bdcolen@earthlink.net> <3D69049A.26641B5E@earthlink.net> <3D694722.1449900F@webshuttle.ch>

Actually, those costs, excluding the car, are charged to the student
while living on campus. Granted, the students who qualify for aid, or
scholarships are in a different grouping. To equate a student life style
with a working life style is itself a common fallacy. At a jr. college
level most students are still artificially tied to their parents
households and are not tied to the general workforce, part time work not
withstanding.  If anything, the student life style is one of the few
egalitarian leisure class activities left to the American public.
Slobodan Dimitrov


Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> 
> /BEGIN ECON LECTURE
> Counting housing, car and food as college costs is a common fallacy but it does
> not make it correct..
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Photo education)
Message from S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Photo education)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: college costs (WAS: [Leica] Photo education))