Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If money is not of concern, I'd use the Contax T3. For lower budget, the Olympus stylus (non-zoom) with double aspherical 35/2.8 lens is a most underrated camera. Dan K. At 08:22 AM 8/29/02 -0500, you wrote: >The Contax T3 is the flagship in my opinion. I load it with Superia 400 >and P and S it. Never tried B&W. Fool proof and spouse can use it. > >Logan Reinwood wrote: > >> >>HI, >> >>However a M is not a big camera, it migth be too big sometimes to carry >>along. I have a lomo that I take sometimes in my pocket. But it is more >>fun than really good, the lens is not good at least not good for making >>big prints, etc. >> >>I am thinking to buy something else, and I am considering a Rollei 35. >>The only drawback I see with the rollei is the manual guessing >>focsussing. Is that a problem? >>I was also considering a minilux, but it is almost as big as an M. >> >>What do lugger use as a smalller camera when a M is too big? >> >>any comment? >> >>TIA, logan >> >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. >>http://www.hotmail.com >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html