Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I stand corrected, at close focus........ Stephen is usually well researched. The only part I have trouble with is that the leses of the era were a certain % error from nominal Fl... just like Leica, which marked the later lenses with the real FL and adjusted the barrel for that specific Fl.... So how did Nikon do this ? Frank Filippone red735i@earthlink.net Steve Gandy's site has another, plausable, explaination: http://www.cameraquest.com/NRF-Contax.htm Frank Filippone wrote: > I disagree......... same back focus.... The stories all those years were > that Zeiss claimed they were different, Nikon claimed they were the > same..... Everyone that swapped lenses and bodies claimed they were the > same.... > > They are the same.... > > Frank Filippone - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html