Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Or, more to the point, how about....a camera with real modern flash capability?;-) - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Richard Savenije Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 7:02 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] R9 How about R8 SE, R8 NT or R8 XP? Same marketing story. Richard Savenije =========================================== It's actually an R8.2.1, since the first production numbers to the R8 had to be, shall we say, recooked. Slobodan Dimitrov Mark Rabiner wrote: > > I think it should be called a R8.4.7 > > Yea that just about nails it. > > Looks OK to me. Now lets see them work up the R6.2 into a R6.8.6 > > Judges hold your numbers up! > > Mark Rabiner > Portland, Oregon USA > http://www.markrabiner.com > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html