Re: [Leica] Re- Clementine

["Rob Appleby" <rob@robertappleby.com>]

For god's sake. Is it so hard to understand you're shooting at the wrong
target?

- -- Rob

http://www.robertappleby.com
Mobile: (+39) 348 336 7990
Home: (+39) 059 303436

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Don R." <don.ro@verizon.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re- Clementine


> Control, control, control--no wonder you are no longer practicing law.
>
> By the way, what is your State of California bar license number?
>
> Don
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Teresa299@aol.com>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re- Clementine
>
>
> >
> > In a message dated 9/30/02 6:20:44 PM, don.ro@verizon.net writes:
> >
> > << Kim:
> >
> >
> > And what business of yours was it to lecture a specific photographer
about
> >
> > anything much less legal matters? If you don't have a state bar license
I
> >
> > seriously doubt your are qualified to give a legal opinion and may be
> guilty
> >
> > of  barristery.>>
> >
> > I don't recall lecturing anyone.  I think I offered a suggestion.  The
> > suggestion, really had nothing to do with legal matters, it was about
> common
> > courtesy.  You may or may not understand that concept.
> >
> > Incidentally, I do have a state bar license with the State of
California.
> I
> > have an inactive membership because I decided there were other things to
> do
> > with my life than practice law.  So, I'm probably guilty of many things
> > though "barristery" is the least of them.
> >
> >
> > <<Just the typical "control freak" wanting to control one more human
being
> I
> >
> > take it.>>
> >
> > Uh, yeah.  Right.  I live my life to control people on the LUG.  That's
> why I
> > subscribed.  I used to try and control people with Japanese made cameras
> but
> > it just wasn't the same.
> >
> >
> > <<If  "model release" is an "issue for potential discussion"  as you now
> say,
> >
> > why not give us your dissertation but leave the specific photographer
out
> of
> >
> > it.  Then you may ramble on with no harm being done.>>
> >
> > I think you're not following the thread properly.  Some one else
> specifically
> > raised the issue of model releases...I basically said that no matter how
> well
> > you think you know someone, in my mind, particularly as it relates to
> > underage, nude or quasi-nude models, it might be a nice thing to let
them
> > give you permission to show their photo on the internet.
> >
> > You may or may not disagree.  It's hard to tell because other than spew
> venom
> > regarding "control" you never addressed the point.
> >
> >
> > <<Let the specific photographer alone. Let him do his thing.>>
> >
> > I don't know Gerry.  I've seen his work.  He does good work.  I assume
> Gerry
> > is a grown man.  I sense that you think I have the power to remotely
> control
> > Gerry into doing things which I want him to do.  I assure you that I
> don't.
> > The specific photographer in question decided to remove his photos and
vow
> > never ever ever to show his work on the LUG again.   Because he's been
> quiet
> > on the issue, I'm not even sure why he specifically chose to act that
way.
> > But in any event, that's his choice.  As a grown man he can chose to
share
> > with the LUG or not.  But understand this, any photographer on the LUG
can
> > "do their thing," short of Brian throwing them off the list.   When LUG
> > members publically post a photo or a thought, it leaves the thought or
> photo
> > open for discussion, or in the case of folks like you, a complete lack
of
> > civility... but that's the risk we all take when we decide to stop
lurking
> > and start posting.
> >
> >
> > -kim
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html