Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/10/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It is waterless and earth friendly were the benefits I heard...install anywhere w/o water or toxic waste. (not that photo waste is particularly toxic) mark > > >Yes, the film is eaten by the machine, so > there are no negatives... It > >is interesting, but the quality is less than > acceptable. > > What's the point? If you have film capable of a > given quality, and providing a permanent (more > or less) file copy; why would you want less > quality and destruction of the file copy. Is > the whole point speed? And if so wouldn't a > digital camera still provide more speed? What > am I missing here? > -- > To unsubscribe, see > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html