Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/10/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think the shot is fine as it is. The tree on the right holds the image together IMHO, as does the gravestone on the left, which balances the tree nicely. The human touch is an essential part of the image. Without it the shot is sterile. I can't explain why - it just does :-). I loved the shot as it is. But that's what makes photography and sharing images on the LUG so interesting and stimulating. It makes you think, which has to be a good thing. Regards Mark Pope Swindon Wilts, UK http://www.monomagic.co.uk http://www.leica-gallery.net/mark-pope - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Gerard" <geeman1066@earthlink.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:12 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] GeeBees' PAW Week 40 > Graham, > You've gotten very, very good at seeing clouds. This sunset is > beautiful in and of itself, but coupled with the graveyard, it is very > poignant. As I scrolled across, I found that I liked the shot better > without both the tree on the right edge, and the person tending a grave. > I thought that the person added a nice human touch, but for some reason I > can't explain, I liked it better without a human figure. If someone can > explain why a person should or shouldn't be in the shot, I'd be interested > to hear more thoughts on this. > Regards, > Michael Gerard > geeman1066@earthlink.net > > geebeespaw wrote: > > > http://www.geebeephoto.com/html/week_40.html > > > > PAW Index: > > http://www.geebeephoto.com/html/paw_index.html > > > > Graham > > http://geebeephoto.com > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html