Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/10/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leicas stolen - LUG strikes back!
From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:09:39 -0700
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJOEIOCIAB.darkroom@ix.netcom.com>

Jail is the least productive option. 
Slobodan Dimitrov

Austin Franklin wrote:
> 
> C.,
> 
> > Yes, but remember you will be putting a teenage
> 
> I don't believe we know she was a teenager.  It was said she was a "young
> girl", and that can mean 20's, depending on how old you are.
> 
> > mother in jail
> 
> I don't believe anyone was suggesting jail.
> 
> > ...all over a camera that has been returned.
> 
> Hum.  "returned".  She was caught trying to pawn off stolen goods, and it
> was taken from her at that point in time.  I guess it was returned in some
> sense of the word, but certainly NOT by her own doing.
> 
> > Through the veil of distance, I have a feeling the cop/judge in
> > charge knew
> > exactly what they were doing when they processed the case.
> 
> I wasn't aware the case had been "processed" to any end, as it was stated
> that the DA's office was "surprised that she'd only been given a ticket"
> given the value of the gear.  So, the cop/judge etc. didn't have complete
> info apparently.  The only thing that was relayed, as far as I read, was a
> "ticket" was issued...and she was remanded to "some sort of counseling
> program for treatment".
> 
> Austin
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: [Leica] Leicas stolen - LUG strikes back!)