Re: [Leica] 135mm lens

["Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es>]

Thank you all for your advices.
I visited the www.cameraquest.com and Stephen Gandy says that Elmar is not
very sharp lens and Hektor chrome (coated) is not a very good lens (prone to
fogging). I have the posibility to buy a Late Canon 135 3.5 lens (not
senerar but later version) for 150 $ in mint condition.
Following Stephen Gandy recommendation the best 135mm SM lenses are Nikon
and Canon
Any experiences with this lens,
Rafael
- ----- Original Message -----
From: <ned@kajabbi.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens


> Hi,
> Don't forget the 135 F2.8 Elmarit. Due to its weight it's VERY
undervalued.
> If you can handle the Noctilux, the Elmarit is a breeze and it cuts a
super
> sharp image.
> >-- Original Message --
> >Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 19:21:01 +1100
> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> >From: Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au>
> >Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens
> >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> >
> >
> >>Hi all,
> >>I am looking for a 135mm lens for my M6. My budget is not full, so I am
> >>looking for a good, cheap lens. As far as I know there are 3 options in
> >SM
> >>lenses:
> >>Canon 135mm 3.5
> >>Nikon 135mm 3.5
> >>Hektor 135mm 4
> >>What would be your choice?
> >
> >135mm Tele-elmar not too expensive, and just fabulous and I mean great
> lens
> >--
> >Alastair Firkin
> >
> >http://www.afirkin.com
> >
> >http://www.familyofman2.com
> >
> >  ()" "'()
> >  (   '0',)
> >(,,)(")(")
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

_______________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger
Nueva versión: Webcam, voz, y mucho más ¡Gratis! 
Descárgalo ya desde http://messenger.yahoo.es

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html