Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Austin, Thanks for all the great info. I'm intrigued by the Faveon sensor technology, (actually digital technology as a whole) unfortunately none of the big boys seem to have picked up on it. I don't think that Sigma can really do it justice and Nikon and Canon seem to have chosen their high end chips, at least for the near term. I assume the physics behind that technology would be three fold in comparison. What is the general buzz in the industry in regards to the X3? Will we be seeing the rapid jump in pixel count with the X3 as we did with the two other sensor systems? Are there 6, 10, or even 20 megapixel X3's in the works, or is it even feasible? Will we see it or variations of it in the future? What is your gut feeling regarding the business (CCD) as it is today? Is there anything BIG around the corner, or is today's technology what we'll be seeing in products for the foreseeable future? Again, thanks for all your patience with all my questions, I think I'll do a little poking around on Kodak's site. Regarding your work I can't think of a more interesting field to be in today or at least in the past 5 years or so. It must be very rewarding to see all this digital technology hitting the main stream. What applications do you design for? Thanks Sam Krneta - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Austin Franklin Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:57 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] Digital back for Leica lenses Hi Sam, > Does that mean that we are nearing a threshold in CCD development as > it > relates to size, using today's format benchmarks? At what resolution > would the laws of physics start working against the 35mm format? They already DO work against it. It's a matter of balancing a number of things. First and foremost is you pretty much need %100 sensor yield. In other words, all the sensor elements in the array have to be good. The larger the sensor (as in number of sensor elements) the higher the chance that some of them will be bad. Second is balancing sensor element size with noise. The smaller the sensor elements, the higher the noise. You can get a lot more sensor elements per unit area, but you get noise images. For video, that is fine, but for one shot imaging like photography, it's not so good. > Are we ever going to see > 40 > megapixel CCDs based on the 35mm format? That's an easy thing to calculate. Assume a 24mm x 36mm (864 sq mm) sensor array size: 5u (25u sq) sensor elements given an array of: 34M 7u (49u sq) sensor elements given an array of: 17M 9u (81u sq) sensor elements given an array of: 11M 12u (144u sq) sensor elements given an array of: 6M And 5u sensors aren't going to be that great, at least in current technology...but it certainly is possible. Processes for making CCDs are getting better....but along with the physical individual sensor size as an issue, it's getting the wires to/from the sensor elements that becomes an issue... > I once read that digital had > to > get to 40 megapixel to equal some of the finer grained 35mm films, Well, that seems about right, but film grains and sensor elements are really different animals. One is random in both size and position, and the other is fixed in both size and position. Apples and oranges. Plus, digital imaging sensors, with the exception of Foveon, don't have three planes of color...only one plane, with %50 Green sensors, %25 Blue and %25 Red. So, don't confuse number of sensor elements with pixels, they are NOT the same, except in the Foveon, which uses a tri-sensor element. > BTW: How do you know so much about digital? I have been designing digital imaging systems for over 25 years ;-) > Any good websites for > someone to learn the basics, something like a CCD Design 101? Funny enough, Kodak. They have a couple of papers on CCD imagers. Try poking around their web site in the digital imaging sensor area, and if you can't find them let me know, and I'll email them to you. Regards, Austin - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html