Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hello Austin, Thanks for the correction. What do you use to scan your Hasselblad negatives ? I've been thinking going the scanning route for medium format (but I dread scanning). - - Phong > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Austin > Franklin > Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 2:24 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] OT: The endless nonsense about film vs. digital > (long rant) > > > Hi Phong, > > > 1. The article is quite old (from 1998 ?) and the information > > on the state of the art and prices is outdated. Nonetheless, > > I agree with the order film, scanned film, digital. > > From my experience, this isn't even right. I get sharper, more detailed, > prints from scanning film and printing on my inkjet printer with Piezo inks, > than I got from chemical prints...and yes, I used very high end glass > (Schneider) and printed from Hasselblad negatives. At least this is true > for me for B&W. I don't really do any color. > > Austin > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html