Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Oh for heaven's sake WAS 1Ds digital results
From: Patrick Jelliffe <pbjbike@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:54:52 -0800 (PST)

- --- Johnny Deadman <lists@johnbrownlow.com> wrote:
> 

> The only way to 
> make comparisons is to go to 'actual pixels' level
> in uncompressed and 
> unsharpened versions of both the digital and the
> scanned image. 
> Otherwise you are just blowing smoke up each other's
> asses -- 
> 
> My own guess is that an 11 MP camera will blow any
> 200 ISO 35mm film 
> out of the water, and will look better than 100 ISO
> 35mm film at 
> anything less than 10x enlargement. I think those
> are conservative 
> estimates too.

I like this "actual pixels" comparison, and the
science behind the conclusion.

> To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Joseph Codispoti" <joecodi@clearsightusa.com> (Re: [Leica] Oh for heaven's sake WAS 1Ds digital results)