Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] digital versus film
From: "Steve LeHuray" <steve@icommag.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:57:46 -0400

> 
> On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 02:32 PM, Steve LeHuray wrote:
> 
>>>> Yes Austin, I have heard that is all true, except for the 6'2" part,
>>>> Brits
>>>> never get that tall, lack of sunshine ;)
>>>
>>> Steve,
>>>
>>> Well, I'm in NEW England, not England... ;-)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Austin
>>>
>>
>> ....oh, excuse! well are you saying Johnny is short and stout?? ;+)
>
> Well, I feel tall and thin when I go to Liverpool and Glasgow, where
> people are short and fat, short and thin in the mid-west, where people
> are tall and fat, and short and fat in LA and NYC where people are tall
> and thing. However I am indeed very clever, rich and charming, and Mrs
> Deadman is a stunna.
>
> --
> Johnny Deadman (5'10, 182)
>

Here in 'Crabtowne' all the sailors & sailorettes drink gallons of beer, are
thin and wiry and wear Bermuda shorts and America's Cup T-shirts all winter
to prove how tuff they are. But none of them have leicas

sl (5'11", 180)
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html