Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dan, your subjects have consented to be photographed. Your not putting the camera to your eye, while taking an image is not quite the same as the hundreds of "from the hip" shots John Brownlow invited us to look at, as his subjects have not consented to being photographed. I must say your framing in the two images you have shared was quite well done, and does tell the story. I have seen "street photography" on this list where the camera was at the eye of the photographer which weren't composed any where near as well! Noel drb@MIT.EDU wrote: >Hey- > >Permission aside, there seems to be a generally negative attitude towards >shooting "from the hip" (or basically without raising a camera to your eye). >What's wrong with clandestine photography? I'm in the middle of a >documentary project on student EMTs. I have permission from the whole class >and the instructors. Some of the students, however, clam up and act funny >when I raise my camera (even my Leica M6 which is so small, so quiet, "looks >like a toy", etc. etc.). Here are two VERY preliminary photos which I shot >without raising my camera. The first one is full-frame, the second is >cropped: > >http://www.drbphoto.com/leica/l6/ > >I still have several weeks of shooting left, and as I get to know my >subjects better, hopefully the tense ones will relax in front of the lens. >If they don't, I have no qualms about pressing the shutter while the camera >is around my neck, on the table, while I'm pretending to screw with the >settings, etc. Am I wrong? > >--Dan > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jerry Lehrer" <jerryleh@pacbell.net> >To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 5:10 PM >Subject: Re: [Leica] As The World Turns > > >> Austin 747 >> >> Don't ask me that question, I didn't bring up Starbucks. Security >> classified places aside, I take the pictures if I am allowed to go >> there. >> >> Jerry >> >> Austin Franklin wrote: >> >> > Jerry, >> > >> > I wasn't aware that "corporate policy" dictated legality, or even >customs? >> > Besides, how do you know the student didn't ask Starbucks for >permission, >> > which in fact, may have been the point of the "exercise"? It gave them >> > experience on asking for access. >> > >> > Austin >> > >> > > BD >> > > >> > > First you say that you have never done that, then you encourage >> > > your students to do just that. Isn't there an English word for that, >> > > besides "catspaw". It starts with an "H" and ends in a "Y". :-) >> > > >> > > Jerry >> > > >> > > bdcolen wrote: >> > > >> > > > Good points, Jeffrey. And there are very few places - "national >> > > > security" aside - where you can't eventually work out a way to take >> > > > photos if your are serious about what you're doing, and have a >> > > > legitimate reason for photographing. >> > > > >> > > > I remember a long discussion on this list about the impossibility of >> > > > shooting inside Starbucks. Couldn't be done, people said. It's >against >> > > > corporate policy, they said. Starbucks sucks, they said. Which is >why I >> > > > challenged one of my students to do a project on a day at >Starbucks - >> > > > http://web.mit.edu/21w.749/www/Students/aaronmihalik/finalproject/ >> > > > >> > > > Starbucks isn't a "cat house," but the principle is the same. ;-) >> > > > >> > > > B. D. >> > >> > -- >> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html