Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: sam k's photos...
From: "Jeffery L. Smith" <jsmith45@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:41:36 -0600
References: <005d01c2bb49$9cdde630$0316fea9@ccasony01>

Jeffrey's comment, not Jeffery's [mine]. His with two syllables, mine with 
three. I try to make it a point, even on the LUG, not to rile anyone. :-)

JeffERY

At 05:10 PM 1/13/2003 -0600, you wrote:
>Thanks for the compliment bd. I like that one myself especially as It's my
>daughter. The thing that got me riled was Jeffery's comment, which I didn't
>understand, but when I looked up who Sturges was it pissed me off that
>someone would make a comment like that. Sorry, but what that man shoots
>doesn't sit well with me. No hard feeling towards you.
>
>Sam
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of bdcolen
>Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:21 PM
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: sam k's photos...
>
>"Towel" is a great shot, Sam -
>The "I hope not" refers to the fact that I consider Jock Sturges not
>much more than a would-be pornographer with an art school grad's photo
>skills....
>
>And, no, I am NOT trying to start a debate about Jock Sturges,
>pornography, or anything else for that matter. I am simply responding to
>Sam's perhaps misunderstanding my ill-considered quip.
>
>B. D.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Sam Krneta
>Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:24 PM
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: sam k's photos...
>
>
>bd,
>
>I missed something here. I don't quite know how to take that.
>
>Sam
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of bdcolen
>Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:06 AM
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: sam k's photos...
>
>God, I hope not! :-)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Jeffrey
>Fass
>Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:27 AM
>To: LUG
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: sam k's photos...
>
>
>Another Jock Sturges...
>
><G>
>
>Jeffrey
>http://www.happyeyeball.com
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kyle Cassidy" <KCassidy@asc.upenn.edu>
>To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 9:41 AM
>Subject: [Leica] Re: sam k's photos...
>
>
> > "towel"'s worth the whole thing:
> >
> > http://skrneta.home.mindspring.com/WEBSHOTS/27.htm
> >
> > I need a print of it.
> >
> > A few of your shots suffer from afraidtogettocloseness. If you're
> > going to photograph someone from across the street, you need a longer
> > lens (imho). There are a few that I'm not sure why you chose to post.
> > "friends" for example doesn't speak to me, or tell me much about the
> > people in it ...
>but
> > the light is nice. "what" also doesn't say anything to me.
> >
> > "right" is really nice.
> >
> > I'd say try and replace about 10 of them and you'll be good.
> >
> > My .02
> >
> > Kyle
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see
> > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html