Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Voigtlander 21 vs. Leica 21 ASPH
From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:11:37 -0800
References: <D50A541F-2760-11D7-AACD-003065D6AD80@earthlink.net>

At 5:38 PM -0800 1/13/03, Craig Semetko wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>Does anybody have any experience with both the Leica 21 ASPH and the 
>Voigtlander 21? Besides the obvious cost difference, are there 
>noticeable differences in image and build quality? Are the owners of 
>the Voigtlander happy with it?
>
>TIA,
>
>Craig

A year ago I compared a number of 21mm lenses useable on the Leica 
M's, including the 21/4 C-V and the 21/2.8 ASPH, which were then 
published in the Viewfinder. The 21 ASPH turned in the best 
performance, in almost all areas, but the 21/4 C-V was not that far 
behind although it did not surpass the ASPH in any area except size 
and price. It's a great value, and especially if this focal length is 
not a major one for you, it's an excellent choice. I got one even 
though I already had the ASPH for those times when I didn't want to 
carry the larger lens.

If you do get the 21/2.8 ASPH, just make sure you get the Cosina 21mm 
finder. It's almost as good as the old 21 Leica finder and a lot 
cheaper. The new Leica multi-finder is a disaster.

- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Mark Pope" <leica.user@ntlworld.com> (Re: [Leica] Voigtlander 21 vs. Leica 21 ASPH)
In reply to: Message from Craig Semetko <csemetko@earthlink.net> ([Leica] Voigtlander 21 vs. Leica 21 ASPH)