Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Tri Elmar Repair
From: "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:32:27 -0700
References: <BA52CD75.2486%mcahill@laurelgroup.com>

Michael Cahill wrote in part:

>Why do we have to pay substantially more for the same product in order to
>"guarantee" that service to the equipment will be done here?  It's nothing
>but a shakedown, that is unless it has something to do we guaranteeing US
>distributors a certain margin, I don't know.
>
>I think it is a disgrace that a company with the reputation Leica has
>developed over the years (whether rightly or wrongly) allows their US
>subsidiary to squeeze more money from their US customers than they will get
>overseas.  If I am going to pay $2000 for a 35mm camera lens, dammit, it
>should be repaired without cost to me and quickly for a generous period of
>time.  
>
>Maybe we'll have to offer human sacrifice on the altar of Solms :-)
>
>(That damn Nikon F5 is looking better and better)
>
>Mike
>

Hi Mike,

 From where I currently sitting (North of the 49th) Leica USA prices, 
especially on Leica Day look pretty damn good and you may want to do a 
search of the Archives for a better understanding of how Nikon USA deals 
with Grey Market Nikon goods.

Regards,

Greg

>



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Michael Cahill <mcahill@laurelgroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Tri Elmar Repair)