Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]90/4 4 element 11130 295g 90/4 collapsible 11631 340g 90/4 3 element 111830 305g 90/4 Elmar-C 11540 270g 90/2.8 11129 320g 90/2.8 T-E fat 11800 355g 90/2.8 T-E slim 11800 225g 90/2.8 E-M current 11807/11808 410g/560g 90/2 first 11127 685g (I do not know if that weight includes the hood) 90/2 second 11023/11123/11122 685g (lots of variation in design so I imagine the weight fluctuated too) 90/2 third 11136/11137 410g (chrome should be heavier) 90/2 AA 1884 500g (heavier chrome version now available) All weights from Sartorious: not always the most accurate but everything should be in the ball park John Collier On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, at 08:24 PM, Peter Klein wrote: > Between the incredibly heavy original chrome 90mm Summicron and the > more compact 1980s+ 410-gram Summicron-M that's just before and shaped > much like the current 90/AA, there were some large black 90 > Summicrons. Does anyone know the date range and weight of those, or > have a link to a chart that includes them? - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html