Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] niagra falls
From: Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 08:38:58 -0700
References: <20030122145753.GA6119@panix.com> <OE48VOqeOLn9WdjpdsK00011ca8@hotmail.com>

what happens if you shoot Fuji 1600 neopan at 1000 or 1200, then 
develop normally....? Steve

>Rei-
>
>As always - great shots.
>A question :
>I have been testing Fuji 1600 neopan. At 1600 my results are very grainy and
>contrasty. I like your results at EI800. Does this mean you are compensating
>for overexposure in the development?
>
>Eric
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Rei Shinozuka" <shino@panix.com>
>To: "Leica Users Group (LUG)" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:57 AM
>Subject: [Leica] niagra falls
>
>
>>  a mix of leica images and some others i made on a trip the
>>  family took last november to the canadian side of niagra falls.
>>
>>  http://www.shinozuka-family.com/niagra1
>>  http://www.shinozuka-family.com/niagra2
>>
>>  (i am about one year behind scanning... randomly catching up.)
>>
>>  -rei
>>
>>  --
>>  Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
>>  Ridgewood, New Jersey
>>
>>  --
>>  To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- -- 
Steve Barbour
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> ([Leica] niagra falls)
Message from "faneuil" <leica_korenman@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)