Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] niagra falls
From: Ernest Nitka <enitka@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:43:58 -0500
References: <20030122145753.GA6119@panix.com>

Me Too - two rolls of 1600 at 1600 produced thin and contrasty negs in 
HC110B - it would appear the answer is to shoot it at 1000 and back the 
development time off by about 20%    Any thoughts other than ernie's an idiot?

ernie


At 10:22 AM 1/22/03 -0500, you wrote:
>Rei-
>
>As always - great shots.
>A question :
>I have been testing Fuji 1600 neopan. At 1600 my results are very grainy and
>contrasty. I like your results at EI800. Does this mean you are compensating
>for overexposure in the development?
>
>Eric
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Rei Shinozuka" <shino@panix.com>
>To: "Leica Users Group (LUG)" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:57 AM
>Subject: [Leica] niagra falls
>
>
> > a mix of leica images and some others i made on a trip the
> > family took last november to the canadian side of niagra falls.
> >
> > http://www.shinozuka-family.com/niagra1
> > http://www.shinozuka-family.com/niagra2
> >
> > (i am about one year behind scanning... randomly catching up.)
> >
> > -rei
> >
> > --
> > Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
> > Ridgewood, New Jersey
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)
In reply to: Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> ([Leica] niagra falls)