Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Beta Testers Needed, FOM2 Submission
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 12:24:15 -0800
References: <002501c2ce0a$af0aa360$6401a8c0@home> <3E42BD0D.E787F73F@hemenway.com>

Jim

Wow what a difference!  I can't read black on dark blue, so I
ignored his request.

Why do so many web-sters use unreadable combinations of
colors for letters and background?

Jerry

Jim Hemenway wrote:

> Tom:
>
> You might want to construct those pages so that folks like me who prefer
> Netscape 4.8 can read 'em.
>
> http://www.hemenway.com/For_TomSmart/Viewed_with_Netscape.gif
>
> http://www.hemenway.com/For_TomSmart/Viewed_with_IE.gif
>
> --
> Jim - http://www.hemenway.com
>
> Tom Smart wrote:
> >
> > Alastair has asked me to work on a revised process for the FOM2 submission
> > process for this year.  I've put together some pages that need testing.
> >
> > The process I'm proposing is all web-based and requires file submission
> > directly from your hard drive.  When the files get submitted I ask you to
> > provide information about the photo, and it goes into queue for approval.
> > After the approval process you receive an email notification whether it was
> > approved or disapproved, along with a reason if it was not accepted.  If
> > your image gets accepted it goes on for judging at the end of the year, but
> > in the meantime all accepted images are displayed in a series of galleries.
> > The original image gets forwarded on for judging, but I make 2 copies of it
> > for display in the galleries.
> >
> > Before making a decision about whether the process is good I need testers.
> > I need to know:
> >
> > 1. Does the process work, or are you getting errors? (if errors I'll want
> > whatever details you can provide)
> > 2. Is it intuitive enough?
> > 3. Do you have any other ideas about making the process more streamlined or
> > more robust?
> >
> > If you are interested in checking out the proposed system you can visit the
> > following pages (the URLs are subject to change, but here they are for the
> > beta test):
> >
> > http://www.sedationtraining.com/FOM2/register.asp to register (I need this
> > even if you are already registered with FOM2).
> >
> > http://www.sedationtraining.com/FOM2/submit.asp to submit test images once
> > you have registered.
> >
> > http://www.sedationtraining.com/FOM2/ to view galleries, etc..
> >
> > I imagine an on list discussion of your impressions might be beneficial, but
> > specific error messages would be better off coming straight to me.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Tom Smart" <tom@sleepytom.com> (Re: [Leica] Beta Testers Needed, FOM2 Submission)
In reply to: Message from "Tom Smart" <tom@sleepytom.com> ([Leica] Beta Testers Needed, FOM2 Submission)
Message from Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] Beta Testers Needed, FOM2 Submission)