Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Warranty Issues
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:39:44 -0500

Hi Kit,

Yes, the M would work much better, I'm sure.

We are in complete agreement on this one ;-)

Austin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Kit
> McChesney | Acmefoto
> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:07 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] Warranty Issues
>
>
> Actually, though they don't phrase it as such, "intentional acts
> of idiocy"
> aren't covered under Passport Protection. You can define that as you wish,
> but I'd say that jacking up a Porsche with an R9 would qualify for idiotic
> behavior. ;-)
>
> K.
>

> > Of course there are exceptions to this, where someone uses the camera to
> > jack up their car, but those aren't the type of cases we're talking
about
> > here.  Typically, if someone does that, they know it isn't covered under
a
> > normal warranty.  Perhaps Passport covers this?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Austin

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html