Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Hexar RF Back focus one more time
From: Stephen Gandy <leicanikon@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:39:28 -0800
References: <9AE7A22A-3FD0-11D7-BE30-003065D6E648@umich.edu> <3E4C7D0B.E1F57A91@earthlink.net> <001501c2d3ee$d3a6db00$5539aa83@RMIT3105237>

I have not heard of any user reports of problems with the Konica M lenses on
Leica M bodies.   Apparently Konica got it right on the "Konica M" lenses.

I believe the back focus problem is caused when the cumulative plus / minus
parts tolerances on a particular body add up beyond Leica M specs.  this would
explain why some bodies have problems, and others don't.    Judging from user
comments it seems to be an infrequent problem, but that does not make it
nonexistent.

Stephen


Paul Jones wrote:

> Hi Stephen,
>
> Okay so if the back focus can be adjusted to  work with Leica and CV lenses,
> does this mean it would also be out with a Hexanon lense?
>
> What i mean is the back focus a problem with the body, or is that the
> hexanon lenses are designed for a different back focus from the Leica and CV
> lenses?
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
> > or a 12/5.6 at infinity.
> >
> > I was surprised to find my shots with the Voigtlander 12  and Hexar RF of
> the
> > John Travalta film Swordfish weren't as sharp as my first 12 test shots on
> my
> > M6.   (the scene with the bus on its side in front of the bank was shot on
> > Main Street in Ventura CA).    I had the Hexar RF back focus checked, and
> it
> > was off.  It was fixed thru a friend at Konica Japan.    Since the factory
> > can fix the Hexar RF problem if it wants to, it completely escape me why
> some
> > claim there is no problem just because they have not personally
> encountered
> > it.    Bob Shell's  Hexar RF was also out of specs.  His was fixed by Ken
> > Ruth at Photography on Bald Mountain.     certainly not all Hexar RF's
> have
> > back focus problems, but some certainly do.   the only way to be sure is
> to
> > have a particular Hexar RF body checked by a good Leica tech.
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> > Dante Stella wrote:
> >
> > > Dead wrong.  A fast wideangle at infinity, like a 21/2.8.  That is
> > > where if you have any error in back focus, you will focus in front of
> > > or behind infinity.
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Dante Stella <dante@umich.edu> (Re: [Leica] Re: Hexar RF Back focus one more time)
Message from Stephen Gandy <leicanikon@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Hexar RF Back focus one more time)
Message from "Paul Jones" <lug@nrg666.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Hexar RF Back focus one more time)