Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Police departments might want to show they had kept the peace among the peace demonstrators by enhancing the count to make it look like they were doing their job. Nah, that would be unethical. Sonny - ----- Original Message ----- From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 10:25 AM Subject: RE: [Leica] FS: Special Anti-War Protest edition Leica M7 > First, my appologies. > > Second - There are several possible explanations for the media in some > cities siting smaller numbers than the police - first, caution > (timidity) on the part of the media, fearing that if they err on the > side of siting too large a number, they will lose credibility with the > "establishment;" second, different counting methods; third, counts done > at different times; third, counts done in different places. I seriously > doubt that the NYPD is "siding" with the demonstrators and inflating the > counts - remember how traumatized that department was by 9/11 and the > losses it suffered both in terms of its own, and in terms of firemen > friends of cops - I would expect the average NYPDer - for very > understandable reasons - to view the demonstrators as "tools" of the > 9/11 terrorists and to deflate, rather than inflate, the numbers. > > B. D. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Henning > Wulff > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 5:24 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] FS: Special Anti-War Protest edition Leica M7 > > > At 3:21 PM -0500 2/16/03, bdcolen wrote: > >Oh pulllleeeze, Henning - Any of us are capable of looking at the t.v. > >coverage of the demonstrations this past weekend and telling that > >however one wants to argue about head counts, there was an astounding > >number of people, in New York, London, Paris, Berlin, Rome, etc. etc., > >who came out to protest. > > > >"1000 weirdo people who don't count" - dream on. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > >[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Henning > >Wulff > >Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 7:12 PM > >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > >Subject: RE: [Leica] FS: Special Anti-War Protest edition Leica M7 > > > > > >At 5:59 PM -0500 2/14/03, Austin Franklin wrote: > >> > Well, the last one was estimated by SF Police (not organisers) at > >>> 100,000 to 150,000 and with the growing shift in public feeling > >>> about potential war, I would guess rather more than that this. > >>> > >>> How big does it have to be before it's classed as "massive"...? > >> > >>I don't know, but when they count the number, are they going to use > >>"statistical" (snicker, cough, choke...) methods, and "really" count > >>only a very dense area, and then apply this density for some overall > >>(inflated) area...and play with the numbers so that 10,000, including > >>normal traffic and tourists etc. somehow turns into "100,000 ANGRY > >>protestors"? > > > >No, of course not. They're going to look at a large field, in which > >there are only 10 or 20 protesters and apply _that_ density for the > >overall area and arrive at a conclusion that 100,000 angry protesters > >are really only 1000 weirdo people who don't matter anyway. > > > >-- > > B.D., I think you're not clear on my point. My post was merely a > rejoinder to Austin's assumptions of counting numbers. Some little > bit of sarcasm was supposed to be apparent in my posting. > > BTW, I took part in Vancouver's protest march yesterday, for which > there was also a larger turnout than officials had expected. It was > fairly dark and drizzly, so photo-ops weren't always the best. > > I also noticed that some American papers were reporting numbers > different than police estimates from those areas, never mind the > estimates from other sources. The Times reported 200,000 people in > Berlin, whereas the police estimate was 500,000. Simlar discrepancies > were evident with respect to other protest numbers. > > -- > * Henning J. Wulff > /|\ Wulff Photography & Design > /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com > |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html