Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] M[67] ramblings
From: "Kit McChesney | acmefoto" <kitmc@acmefoto.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:35:04 -0700

Jerry--

Hey there. Yes, I've heard of Detroit. My dad was the oldest person working
the assembly line in Atlanta when he retired. He was so old that they had to
pay him his pension while he was still working. Retired at age 72. And I
could tell you horror stories about what goes on in an auto factory.

Now, as for Leica, well, you have some old Leica's, don't you? Have you been
trading them in every two? And remember ... some of us weren't around to
change Oskar Barnack's diapers, so we don't have an ur-Leica stowed away in
our Lederhosen! Some of us like to buy new things!

And honestly, have you ever found a Leica in a garage sale? I think you just
made that up.

Kit

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jerry
Lehrer
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:26 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] M[67] ramblings


Kit

Have you never heard of the Detroit inspired doctrine of  "Planned
Obsolescence"?

How are they gonna sell M7s, when you folks want to keep using
and fixing your M2 thru M6?

Live with it, buy a new Leica every 2 years and sell the old ones
at garage sales.

If you want Leica to stay in business ya gotta buy!

Jerry

Kit McChesney | acmefoto wrote:

> Well, and can't these parts be made again, or am I just being totally
naive?
> You'd think Leica would want to supply parts for cameras, especially for a
> model that enjoyed 20 years of production! There are quite a few out
there,
> no?
>
> Kit
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Bill
> Satterfield
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:51 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] M[67] ramblings
>
> What would you need to repair it? Maybe we should put together a kit.
>  Is this possible or practical?
>
> John Collier wrote:
>
> > One reason for the switch to the TTL was the fact that the M6
> > electronics were obsolete and no longer available. As far as I know
> > they have sufficient supplies for repairs for a good time yet.
> >
> > John Collier
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 08:19 AM, Austin Franklin wrote:
> >
> >>> Do you want to buy a camera that will last 30-50 years or do you
> >>> want to be
> >>> told the ( electronic) parts are not available in 5 years?
> >>
> >>
> >> Bingo, Frank.  I'm now being told my 15 year old Hasselblad 200x can no
> >> longer be serviced...  This does not make me very happy.  I believe
> >> even the
> >> meter parts for the M6 will eventually be the downside.
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] M[67] ramblings)