Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M[67] ramblings
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:19:22 -0800
References: <NDEIJCBGJPIEPDFEENCMGEALCJAA.kitmc@acmefoto.com>

Kit

No, why should I have done that?

Jerry

Kit McChesney | acmefoto wrote:

> Yes, Jerry, but were you putting windows in trucks at one truck a minute?
> Did you work an assembly line? Ever done that? ;-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jerry
> Lehrer
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 5:47 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] M[67] ramblings
>
> Kit
>
> I was working in the aerospace industry at 73 and collecting a
> pension ---$83.01 per month.
>
> Yes, I once did buy a Leica at a garage sale.  Also a Piaget
> watch (not the same sale). A Linn Sondek Turntable. An 1956
> Navy Colt. A Sherline machine shop. Nikon binoculars. Nikonos
> camera. Several Daguerreotypes (sp?).
>
> Jerry
>
> Kit McChesney | acmefoto wrote:
>
> > Jerry--
> >
> > Hey there. Yes, I've heard of Detroit. My dad was the oldest person
> working
> > the assembly line in Atlanta when he retired. He was so old that they had
> to
> > pay him his pension while he was still working. Retired at age 72. And I
> > could tell you horror stories about what goes on in an auto factory.
> >
> > Now, as for Leica, well, you have some old Leica's, don't you? Have you
> been
> > trading them in every two? And remember ... some of us weren't around to
> > change Oskar Barnack's diapers, so we don't have an ur-Leica stowed away
> in
> > our Lederhosen! Some of us like to buy new things!
> >
> > And honestly, have you ever found a Leica in a garage sale? I think you
> just
> > made that up.
> >
> > Kit
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jerry
> > Lehrer
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:26 PM
> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] M[67] ramblings
> >
> > Kit
> >
> > Have you never heard of the Detroit inspired doctrine of  "Planned
> > Obsolescence"?
> >
> > How are they gonna sell M7s, when you folks want to keep using
> > and fixing your M2 thru M6?
> >
> > Live with it, buy a new Leica every 2 years and sell the old ones
> > at garage sales.
> >
> > If you want Leica to stay in business ya gotta buy!
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > Kit McChesney | acmefoto wrote:
> >
> > > Well, and can't these parts be made again, or am I just being totally
> > naive?
> > > You'd think Leica would want to supply parts for cameras, especially for
> a
> > > model that enjoyed 20 years of production! There are quite a few out
> > there,
> > > no?
> > >
> > > Kit
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Bill
> > > Satterfield
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:51 AM
> > > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > Subject: Re: [Leica] M[67] ramblings
> > >
> > > What would you need to repair it? Maybe we should put together a kit.
> > >  Is this possible or practical?
> > >
> > > John Collier wrote:
> > >
> > > > One reason for the switch to the TTL was the fact that the M6
> > > > electronics were obsolete and no longer available. As far as I know
> > > > they have sufficient supplies for repairs for a good time yet.
> > > >
> > > > John Collier
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 08:19 AM, Austin Franklin wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>> Do you want to buy a camera that will last 30-50 years or do you
> > > >>> want to be
> > > >>> told the ( electronic) parts are not available in 5 years?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Bingo, Frank.  I'm now being told my 15 year old Hasselblad 200x can
> no
> > > >> longer be serviced...  This does not make me very happy.  I believe
> > > >> even the
> > > >> meter parts for the M6 will eventually be the downside.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, see
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Kit McChesney | acmefoto" <kitmc@acmefoto.com> (RE: [Leica] M[67] ramblings)