Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/02/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3
From: "Gary Williams" <nasmformyzombie@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:16:44 -0500
References: <20030225011413.97780.qmail@web40807.mail.yahoo.com> <038501c2dc6f$2236ea20$6401a8c0@oemcomputer> <3E5AD8A2.AEAD6092@pacbell.net> <000501c2dd32$037b22e0$ab4179a5@mindspring.com> <3E5C1063.E0AEC872@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3
> Gary
>
> TA has been snubbed by Leica not buying his design outright,
> as I know it is superior to the original Leicavit as used on the
> old MP. The NIH Syndrome, I guess.
>
> Jerry
>
No question. But Tom will do OK.
Gary
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from Javier Perez <summarex@yahoo.com> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)
Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)
Message from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)
Message from "Gary Williams" <nasmformyzombie@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)
Message from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)