Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Erwin Put's Essay on the MP
From: Steven Alexander <alexpix@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 17:02:38 -0500

on 3/3/03 2:24 PM, Austin Franklin at darkroom@ix.netcom.com wrote:

> 
> Jerry,
> 
> I believe monetary benefit is one of the things that is crucial to any
> action for copyright violations.  It doesn't mean whether there was or
> wasn't, but it's really hard to fuss about someone causing you "harm" if you
> can't substantiate any monetary damage.  Harm because you don't like it, and
> it upsets you, or it may get you in trouble with Leica doesn't usually
> count.  Malice may, but I doubt this was posted with malice.
> 
> Austin
> 
If it is registered with the Copyright Office statutory penalties would
apply, of course no action would be taken without establishing financial
loss.


Happy snaps,
Steven Alexander



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> ([Leica] Jonathan Eastland's Essay on the MP)
Reply from Slobodan Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Erwin Put's Essay on the MP)