Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]oh yeah, and did I mention that acquiring a Bushilux is likely to leave your pocketbook considerably lighter. This is why it's known as the 'rich man's toy'. Can I stop now? JB On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 12:15 PM, Steve LeHuray wrote: >> It is a well known fact that the current version of Bush exhibits an >> enhanced 'glow' when compared to the previous version. However on >> close scrutiny this turns out to be a combination of distortion, a >> narrow zone of focus, and a poor rendition of fine details, especially >> when the aperture (or mouth) is wide open. >> -- >> John Brownlow >> > > ...ha ha ha, I bet you are still sitting there chuckling to yourself > after > writing this little pearl. > > sl > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > - -- John Brownlow http://www.pinkheadedbug.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html