Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Mark Pope's PAW Week 9 (just)
From: "Beddoe, Neil" <nbeddoe@lehman.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:28:11 -0000

Mark,

Does it allow you choose a tome in the neg and allocate it as a particular
tone on the print.  For example, choosing where to put your maximum black?

Neil

- -----Original Message-----
From: Mark Pope [mailto:leica.user@ntlworld.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:51 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Mark Pope's PAW Week 9 (just)


Hi Charles,

to get the best out of the meter, you have to calibrate it for each paper
that you use.  The grades and exposures will vary depending on the
characteristics of the paper, enlarger and type of filtration.  It has been
time consuming because I have been learning how to do this and I made some
silly mistakes along the way.  The problems were with me - not the meter.
However, it is worthwhile.  For example, I was able to bang out 8 12 x 16
prints from different negatives yesterday in just over one hour - all
without a single test strip, saving both time and paper.

I have to 'tweak' multigrade IV as I am currently using the ISO-R settings
recommended by Ilford.  I reckon that start to finish, this will now take me
about 45 minutes to an hour.
Next, I have to calibrate MGIV Warmtone RC, which is around a stop slower
than normal multigrade and not as contrasty.  A full calibration should take
around two hours I reckon and cost me about three or four sheets of 10x8
paper.   I also have some other papers that I use from time to time, but for
the moment they can wait...

Don't let the calibration thing put you off.  Based on my experience to
date, the time invested in calibration is well worth it and it will pay
dividends in the future both in terms of time and materials.  It has also
helped me to better understand the characteristics of photographic paper and
how to interpret the information that appears on the data sheets.  So it has
been a valuable learning experience as well.

Hope that helps

regards


Mark



From: "Charles Hehl" <chehl@comcast.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Mark Pope's PAW Week 9 (just)


> Mark,
>
> I am interested in your recent experience with the Stopclock and
Zonemaster
> system, as I am thinking of buying one also.  In your diary you indicated
> you had a problem getting things calibrated for higher grade papers.  Is
> this common that several hours must be spent calibrating?
>
> Regards,
> Charles Hehl
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Pope" <leica.user@ntlworld.com>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Mark Pope's PAW Week 9 (just)
>
>
> > Hi George,
> >
> > This is a very good piece of darkroom equipment.  It helps to determine
> the
> > correct print exposure and grade.  Basically, you take two measurements
> off
> > the baseboard and the analyser calculates the exposure.  The contrast
> range
> > is shown on a greyscale by a series of LEDs. You can then see the effect
> of
> > changing the grade or exposure on the greyscale before making a print.
> > Last night, I made 8 12x16 prints and not a test strip in sight!
> >
> > If you go to www.rhdesigns.co.uk you can read all about it.  You can
even
> > download the user manuals to get a good understanding of its
capabilities.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Mark Pope
> > Swindon Wilts, UK
> >
> > http://www.monomagic.co.uk
> > http://www.leica-gallery.net/mark-pope
> > http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mark.pope4/Galleries/PAW/index.htm
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist@concentric.net>
> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 5:26 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Mark Pope's PAW Week 9 (just)
> >
> >
> > > > RH designs Zonemaster II
> > > > enlarging
> > > > meter
> > >
> > > Please say a bit more about this device.
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.  All information is subject to change without notice.


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Mark Pope" <leica.user@ntlworld.com> (Re: [Leica] Mark Pope's PAW Week 9 (just))