Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi John, > That is interesting Austin. > > I got considerably less power consumption out of my TTL: > > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/v17/msg07164.html Your numbers look like M6 numbers, not TTL numbers. > What is your serial number? Mine is 2472064. 2468096. I'm curious if the ASA has anything to do with it? Mine was set to 400 for the test, and perhaps I should see if it changes the current draw at all. > I also have the impression, but I have not tested it, that using > TTL flash ups the battery consumption considerably. I do not believe there is any active circuitry in the camera for TTL flash, it's just a sensor, and the flash takes care of any electronics...but I do not know that for a fact, and certainly would like to know. > PS: I am not sure what one could argue about with regard to your > results but it is hilarious none the less to hear you say it. Well, I know, but some people on this list like to argue about anything. It would be just like me telling you what car I drive, and someone here would want to argue with me about it. It happens here. One could argue that I don't know how to properly run the tests, or how to read a meter, or this or that... > Shutter speed dial at any position but "off", shutter released > and pressure on shutter release // 16.48 milli-amperes I don't remember seeing this. I believe the current went to 0 immediately after the shutter was tripped. I'll check that right now. Austin - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html