Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I do not think that any of these lenses are the first version Aspherical model. First of all, it never came with a Titanium finish like the Asph version did. Second there just not that many made for them to have three of them! Finally KEH knows its stuff and would charge appropriately for the first version Aspherical model. John Collier On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 04:43 PM, Richard F. Man wrote: > Thanks all. I am definitely a user of camera equipments. KEH has the > following. Looks like the first one is a pretty good price then. Any > practical difference between Titanium and Chrome? I know BLK is > usually lighter. > ***** > http://www.keh.com/shop/ > product.cfm?bid=LM&cid=06&sid=newused&crid=4711299 > > 35 F1.4 SUMMILUX-M ASPHERICAL TITANIUM (GERMANY) (46) > Excellent > N/A > WAS > $1,369.00 > NOW > $1,269.00 > > > 35 F1.4 SUMMILUX-M ASPHERICAL TITANIUM (GERMANY) (46) *WITH HOOD, CAPS > Excellent Plus > N/A > WAS > $1,669.00 > NOW > $1,539.00 > > > > 35 F1.4 SUMMILUX-M ASPHERICAL CHROME (GERMANY)(46) > Like New > N/A > WAS > $1,799.00 > NOW > $1,739.00 > > At 05:53 PM 3/15/2003 -0500, Edward Caliguri wrote: >> He's right -- I have them both (the Aspherical sitting in it's >> Original box. >> not a useful ray of light has passed through it since it's a >> collector thing >> now. But if you WERE to look VERY hard for differences --- and you >> were are >> optical expert -- you MAY see more shadow detail IF ANY used wide >> open, in >> certain situations. In other words -- no difference -- unless you >> collect. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html