Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Doug Herr wrote: > > on 3/18/03 9:36 PM, Don Dory at dorysrus@mindspring.com wrote: > > > Well, not to be cantankerous, but the 85 F1.4 is an amazingly good lens. At > > least for the one sample I ran four or five rolls of film through. > > It's up against some stiff competition - the other 50mm and longer R lenses > are clearly 'best-in-class' optics, the 80 f/1.4 is merely 'among the best'. > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > The huge air to glass surface on the 85 1.4's of all makes does not give me confidence in the contrast and flare suppression I like to have in my images. An 85 1.4 would be great to have for an SLR but the screens are really so bright now what do we need 1.4 for on an 85? An 85 1.8 or 2 is half the size and weight and twice the results it seems to me. A supremely usable lens I've done most my body of work with it. (Nikon) If I was leaving the studio and going outside with the model and it was getting kind of dark would I want to put on a 1.4? Gee I don't know maybe not for fashion you kind of need more depth of field anyway. Hey!! is the 90 apo Asph R ported over from the M or is it a different design? Now THATs the short tele I'd like for my R body. Why not the sharpest lens in the history of the known universe? OK! Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabinergroup.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html