Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 35 Summilux from KEH, should I complain?
From: Gerry Walden <gwpics@ntlworld.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 22:23:26 +0000
References: <3E7845C5.A5EE5D99@rabinergroup.com> <5.2.0.9.0.20030319134524.02569620@192.168.100.11>

I think you upset him!

Richard F. Man wrote:
> You know, my frigging gloves are off. I am a newbie in RF, and guess 
> what, look at all my posts, I have been cordial, but I grew up in NYC 
> too, so I can be rude and nasty.
> 
> So if you have nothing nice to say, delete my posts. Sure no one has 
> seen my darned lens, but I described what my problems. If you think a 
> newbie who has just spent $1300 on a lens has no rights to ask what 
> other people may think a problem that the newbie has no experience with, 
> take the post and delete the frigging thing.
> 
> Shove it, in other words.
> 
> You want rude, I'll be rude. I am not a newbie in computer either. I 
> have been online since 1982. And don't tell me you have not said me in 
> person or use generalization like some people. You have problems with my 
> posts, delete them.
> 
> Why don't you complain about OT posts instead of legit questions about 
> Leica equipments?
> 
> At 11:08 AM 3/19/2003 -0800, Martin Howard wrote:
> 
>> I'm not suggesting that you have to be casual about it.  I'm 
>> suggesting that you set a standard and then stick to it, rather than 
>> getting your wires all crossed about an issue that only the person it 
>> involves can solve.  If oil on the aperture blades bothers you when 
>> you've paid $$$ (or even $$) for a lens, then return the thing and get 
>> a refund.  Or sell it on to someone who doesn't care.  If not, go 
>> shoot with it.  But posting a question on the LUG asking *other* 
>> people what *you* should do is, for all intents and purposes, a waste 
>> of time and effort.  It's pretty certain that everyone here has a 
>> different standard.  Some people would shriek at stuff that others 
>> wouldn't even notice.
>>
>> Not to mention that no one else on the LUG has even seen this lens, or 
>> know how much oil is on the aperture blades.
> 
> 
> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com> 
> <http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo>
> On-line orders, support, and listservers available on web site.
> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all 
> previous replies in your msgs. ]
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com> (Re: [Leica] 35 Summilux from KEH, should I complain?)
In reply to: Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] 35 Summilux from KEH, should I complain?)
Message from "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com> (Re: [Leica] 35 Summilux from KEH, should I complain?)