Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]One thing (among many) that the Canon i950 has going for it is that it is damn consistent. Create an 11 step greyscale wedge from 100% black to 0% black and print this out and you have (AFAICT) 11 perfectly even steps from absolute pitch black (it almost looks like a carbon deposit!) to paper white. As a result, I've discovered that you can use the eye dropper tool in Photoshop without having to measure from the print out, using either another (flatbed) scanner (which I don't have), or a spot meter (which I don't have either) and a conversion table. This means that calibrating the output is a two-step process. First, I've settled on a method of getting neutral prints with a hint of warmth in the shadows that appears to be consistent (amazingly enough) across various lighting conditions. I use a Hue/Saturation layer, with the settings Hue 29, Saturation 25, and Lightness +10. This is set to "Soft Light" blend mode and placed above all other layers. This has the unfortunate side effect of shifting contrast around. Print out a wedge and the tones will be close to neutral, but the 90% wedge goes to 96%, etc. Black stays black, and white stays white, but the others are jumbled around. So, I create a Curve Adjustments layer, place it on *top* of the Hue/Saturation adjustments layer (yes, order *is* important), set blend mode to normal. I then used the eyedropper on a wedge, command-clicked (on a Mac) on the various wedge segments to get curve points corresponding to those segments, and fiddled with the numerical values until the eye dropper told me that I have even steps between the wedges. The curve looks a little odd, but print out a test print with these two adjustments layers, and I appear to have attained the illusive goal of controllable, reproducable, linear grey scale images, using all six inks, on a particular paper (Epson Matte Heavyweight). For now, I think I'm happy with this and I'll spend my $195 on film, developer, and paper rather than in Piezography BW quadtones. The results *are* different from a photographic print (there is no way you'd ever mistake the two), but I must say, I'm beginning to like the aesthetics of inkjet prints on their own merit. M. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html